Here’s a bold truth: even Hollywood’s biggest stars can’t predict box office success. Case in point? Dwayne Johnson’s recent film, The Smashing Machine, which hit theaters over the weekend to a surprisingly muted response. Despite earning just $6 million in its opening weekend—the lowest debut of Johnson’s career—the actor remains unshaken and proud of the project. But here’s where it gets controversial: Does a film’s box office performance truly define its worth? Johnson doesn’t think so.
Directed by Benny Safdie and produced by A24, The Smashing Machine stars Johnson as UFC Hall of Famer Mark Kerr, a fighter grappling with both his career and opioid addiction. The film, which premiered to a rousing reception at the Venice Film Festival, also features Emily Blunt as Kerr’s then-girlfriend. While its awards season aspirations remain intact, the commercial response has sparked conversations about the disconnect between critical acclaim and audience turnout.
In a heartfelt Instagram post, Johnson reflected on the experience, writing, ‘From deep in my grateful bones, thank you to everyone who has watched *The Smashing Machine. In our storytelling world, you can’t control box office results—but what I realized you can control is your performance, and your commitment to completely disappear and go elsewhere. And I will always run to that opportunity.’* He also praised Safdie, calling it an honor to transform into the role and crediting the film with changing his life.
And this is the part most people miss: Johnson’s performance has been widely praised, with The Hollywood Reporter’s Jordan Mintzer noting his ability to portray Kerr’s torment without overdoing it. ‘He manages to go deep here,’ Mintzer wrote, ‘killing the audience with kindness as a benign warrior who suffers from one scene to the next.’ Even Mark Kerr himself has lauded Johnson’s dedication, highlighting his ability to connect deeply with others during conversations.
So, while The Smashing Machine may not have smashed box office records, it’s clear that Johnson’s commitment to the craft hasn’t wavered. But here’s the question: Does a film’s financial success matter more than its artistic impact? Or is there room to celebrate both? Let’s discuss in the comments—I’m curious to hear your take!
