Are you tired of security alerts that leave you guessing? XM Cyber is changing the game by connecting your external attack surface with your internal vulnerabilities, giving you a clear, actionable view of your real risks. This update bridges the gap between what's exposed outside your network and what's vulnerable within, offering a strategic advantage for security teams.
By integrating External Attack Surface Management (EASM) with internal risk validation, XM Cyber provides a comprehensive, end-to-end approach. This means you can instantly see not just what's exposed, but also how those exposures can be chained together with internal vulnerabilities to threaten your critical business assets. It's like having a map that shows exactly how an attacker could move through your system.
"With these enhancements, we are answering the ‘So What?’ question for EASM," says Boaz Gorodissky, CTO at XM Cyber. "We don’t just show you that a door is open; we prove exactly how an attacker leverages that external exposure to pivot internally and compromise your critical assets." But here's where it gets controversial... many security solutions provide alerts, but few can demonstrate the actual path an attacker would take.
The XM Cyber Continuous Exposure Management Platform achieves this by using a unique, two-step validation process, focusing on an attacker's perspective. First, it validates if an external exposure is truly exploitable in your specific environment, confirming the initial breach point. Then, using XM Cyber's Attack Graph Analysis, it models the attacker's next moves, proving whether the entry point can lead to your critical assets. This delivers actionable insights, backed by proof, helping security teams eliminate false positives and focus on the risks that truly matter.
Thomas S, Head of IT Infrastructure at Privatmolkerei Bechtel, puts it simply: "XM Cyber gives us a clear connection between external exposures and the systems running our production environment. Instead of chasing long lists of alerts, we can immediately see which issues pose real risk to the business and fix what actually matters." And this is the part most people miss... the ability to prioritize remediation efforts based on actual, exploitable risks.
What do you think? Do you agree that understanding the full attack path is crucial? Or do you think there are other aspects of security that are more important? Share your thoughts in the comments!
